In the Dev Telegram, Red Phone dropped a list of use cases and ideas for inscriptions and metaprotocols. What key advantages are there in building on Cosmos Hub via the Asteroid Protocol vs other chains that support smart contracts?
Perhaps one of the biggest advantages to building on the Hub is the reach/support for ATOM among centralized exchanges. Often, ATOM is the only Cosmos-based tokens supported by CEXes, and CEX support makes it extremely easy for normies to get their hands on ATOM. With a little ATOM in a wallet, they can immediately start inscribing or swapping on http://asteroidprotocol.io. Likewise, Cosmos Hub is the biggest blockchain in the Cosmos by market cap. It’s so big, well-known and established that when you say “Cosmos,” most people assume you’re talking about Cosmos Hub and ATOM. It has the mind-share, the history, the economic might and branding power to be truly sustainable, and that makes it an ideal spot to build. On the technical side, the biggest advantage is the permanent nature of inscriptions. When you inscribe something onto the Hub, you’re embedding it directly on the blockchain for as long as the Hub continues to operate. This is possible on smart contract chains, but it’s not standard and often expensive. Instead, most smart contract chains encourage storing your data on permaweb protocols like IPFS, Arweave or Filecoin. In effect, Asteroids turn Cosmos Hub into a permaweb protocol. Anyone can write data there and be assured that some third party can’t come and erase or alter that data. Then, other devs – even web2 devs – can use that data within their apps.